[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#45966: marked as done (X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC)



Your message dated Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:12:25 -0700
with message-id <19990925071225.P24595@benham.net>
and subject line Bug#45966: X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 1999 11:21:55 +0000
Received: (qmail 27861 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1999 11:21:50 -0000
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au (postfix@202.12.87.129)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 1999 11:21:50 -0000
Received: by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 77990175D; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 21:22:57 +1000 (EST)
From: <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Subject: X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Reply-To: bam@snoopy.apana.org.au
Message-Id: <19990925112257.77990175D@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 21:22:57 +1000 (EST)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting, it continues to
state X-Debian-CC, but this has been replaced (from what I have
read in debian-devel and debian-hurd) by X-Debbugs-CC.

I am not really sure if I should bug www.debian.org or
bugs.debian.org, so please reassign as required.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux snoopy 2.2.12 #1 Thu Sep 2 10:09:15 EST 1999 i486 unknown

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 45966-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 1999 14:12:04 +0000
Received: (qmail 17334 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1999 14:12:03 -0000
Received: from dhcp008.53.lvcm.com (HELO tali.benham.net) (@24.234.53.8)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 1999 14:12:03 -0000
Received: from gecko by tali.benham.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	id 11UsYs-0007nB-00; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:12:26 -0700
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:12:25 -0700
From: Darren Benham <gecko@debian.org>
To: bam@snoopy.apana.org.au, 45966-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#45966: X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC
Message-ID: <19990925071225.P24595@benham.net>
References: <19990925112257.77990175D@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre1i
In-Reply-To: <19990925112257.77990175D@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Sender: Darren Benham <gecko@benham.net>


--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It will be fixed in the next update

On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 09:22:57PM +1000, bam@snoopy.apana.org.au wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A
>=20
> In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting, it continues to
> state X-Debian-CC, but this has been replaced (from what I have
> read in debian-devel and debian-hurd) by X-Debbugs-CC.
>=20
> I am not really sure if I should bug www.debian.org or
> bugs.debian.org, so please reassign as required.
>=20
> -- System Information
> Debian Release: 2.1
> Kernel Version: Linux snoopy 2.2.12 #1 Thu Sep 2 10:09:15 EST 1999 i486 u=
nknown
>=20
>=20
> -- =20
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian=
.org
>=20
>=20

--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE37NhJbbwt//gBAIoRAeA+AJ44LmJjYbKfil5AB1VTWY9I4111PwCeLzxn
n4QhpxkbtjLQ5Oy+QaF7rdA=
=2Pri
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8--


Reply to: