Re: debian gnu/linux
Others have, surprisingly enough :) , had this discussion before;
http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/%7Eflavell/alt/alt-table.html
Regards,
mkyed
On 10-Sep-99 Darren Benham wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 12:54:19AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:33:44PM -0700, Darren Benham wrote:
>> > I disagree...
>>
>> How is this a matter of opinion?
> Putting ALT tags, empty alt tags, no alt tags, filled alt tags won't
> cause pages not to load...
>
>>
>> > empty alt tags are MORE evil than no alt tag at all.
>>
>> There are no alt tags.
>>
>> The alt attribute is mandatory on the img tag. It is perfectly OK to
>> specify an empty alt attribute.
> OK in whose book? It is NOT ok in my book, period.
>
>>
>> What important or interesting information does a logo carry that is relevant
>> to all Debian pages?
>
> None, that's the point. If you see an image w/o any description (like swirl
> or logo) you don't know, for sure, if that logo is something you want or
> should
> look at. All you know is it's "something" With a description, you can
> think,
> Oh... the logo, I don't need to see that and skip it...
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: