[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: slink elm not Y2K?

Vincent Renardias said:
> it currently reads:
> elm-me+		>=2.4pl25ME+56-1	OK? 
> while it should read
> elm-me+         >=2.4pl25ME+65-1        OK?
Why? I couldn't find any Y2K fixes in the changelog between these
versions.  Have I missed something?

> I just saw another problem; the table says:
> emacs20		20.2		OK? 
> while there *is* a y2k bug in emacs20 20.3-10. (see #43249)
Hmm, you're right, even though the GNU web page says it is ok.
I will adjust the entry and put the URL as the bug report.

  - Craig

Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7  47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/     <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org>              Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>

Reply to: