Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B]
At Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:18:32 -0500,
James A. Treacy <treacy@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Anyone here know Japanese and willing to translate for us?
It's a brief translation.
He want to know perl5.004 is really year 2000 compliant.
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:37:11 +0900
From: Kihara Seiko <whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp>
To: webmaster@debian.org
Subject: About perl5.004 year 2000 compliance
I had a look at your web pages, in which Y2K problem has been fixed at
perl-base 5.004-6 and the following URL is given as the reference,
but I can't find perl5.004 anywhere.
http://language.perl.com/news/y2k.html
According to the above page, perl (without version number)
is already year 2000 compliant, but which statements describe
that perl5.004 is year 2000 compliant?
Would you like to tell me where does official statements in
perl site announce that perl5.004 or later is year 2000 compliant, please?
Sincerely yours
> ----- Forwarded message from Kihara Seiko <whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp> -----
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:37:11 +0900
> From: Kihara Seiko <whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp>
> To: webmaster@debian.org
> Subject: perl5.004?$B$N?(B
> 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B
>
> $B%[!<%`%Z!<%8$rGR8+$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
> perl-base 5.004-6$B$K$F(B2000$BG/LdBj$OBP1~$5$l$F$$$k(B
> $B$H$N$3$H$G2<5-$N(BURL$B$,;2>H@h$H$J$C$F$*$j$^$7$?$,!"(B
> $B$I$3$K$b(Bperl5.004$B$H$O=q$$$F$*$j$^$;$s$G$7$?!#(B
>
> http://language.perl.com/news/y2k.html
>
> $B>e5-$N5-;v$rFI$_$^$9$H(BPerl$B!J%P!<%8%g%s;XDj$J$7!K$K(B
> $B4X$7$F$O$9$Y$F(B2000$BG/$KBP1~$G$-$k$h$&$J;v$,=q$$$F$"$j(B
> $B$^$7$?$,!"6qBNE*$K$I$NItJ,$K(B5.004$B$,(B2000$BG/LdBj$KBP1~$H(B
> $B=q$$$F$"$k$N$G$7$g$&$+!#(B
>
> $B$*K;$7$$$H$3$m!"?=$7Lu$4$6$$$^$;$s$,!"(BPerl$B%5%$%H$N8x<0(B
> $BH/I=$N$I$3$K(B5.004$B0J9_$,(B2000$BG/BP1~$G$"$k$+$,8+Ev$?$j$^$;(B
> $B$s$N$G!"$*65$($$$?$@$1$^$9$G$7$g$&$+!#(B
>
> $B$h$m$7$/$*4j$$$$$?$7$^$9!#(B
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
Regards,
Fumitoshi UKAI
Reply to: