[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: slink elm not Y2K?

Vincent Renardias said:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
> > Also, elm should be added to the Debian Y2K page http://www.debian.org/y2k/
> Webmaster:
> Versions up to and including 2.4pl25ME+59 are known to have y2k
> problems.
> >From elm's changelog, 7 y2k pbms have been fixed between 2.4pl25ME+48 and
> 2.4pl25ME+66.
> I have no info on the y2k status (compliant or not) of the current
> release.

I have made the following changes to the Y2K pages:
elm-me+ <=2.4pl25ME+52-1 BAD http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README
elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+56-1 OK? http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README

  - Craig

Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7  47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/     <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org>              Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>

Reply to: