Re: no link to the y2k page?
Ugh, I have no idea why this got sent to this email address, anyway..
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> About the list: dialog doesn't handle dates, so it's safe. Same for
> base-passwd, base-files, hostname, dpkg and e2fsprogs. (the only dates dealt
> with are time_t's, not ASCII stuff).
I'll change that.
> Should we send a note to all maintainer to ask them to check if their
> packages are y2k-safe? If we get info for all packages we will have
> to reorganize the list as well..
I sent an email... three months ago, got some great responses from
about, say, 5 maintainers.
> Also, there appear to be two types of OK.. what is the difference?
You mean "OK" and "OK?" Hmm, I used to have a description, it is the
same as GNU's anyway.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: