Re: content negotiation for language in web pages
> Pardon me for being dense, but it is not any worse than the
> current situation, is it? I mean, we have the default language at the
> moment. Though we can't mandate content negotiation on mirror
> servers, we can suggest that they do so; don't most modern servers
> support CN quite easily?
>
> And in any case, it does seem like CN is the way to go, and
> even mirror servers that do not support it yet shall gradually get to
> supporting it.
>
Exactly. That's why I suggested the 3rd version. It allows the pages
to work on both servers that do and do not support CN.
- Jay
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-www-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: