Quoting Steve Langasek (firstname.lastname@example.org): > Hi Vincent, > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:56:24PM +0200, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > > <snip> > > > Debian still packages STK 0.8 (which doesnt have Sara iirc) but it > > will eventually package 0.9. IMHO the offending materials should be > > stripped off from the tracks if possible (the tracks are specified as > > xml file so removing mark should works in most case). > > Ok; but what is your reason for posting about this to debian-women, instead > of having a conversation with the package maintainers? Wild guess: Vincent might want to get women's input about these issues instead of just having his own feeling used as the ground for discussion|debate with the package maintainers and/or upstream. But, of course, he probably can answer this better than me. Still, I don't think it to be a bad choice to have a prior discussion on d-w....
Description: Digital signature