Processed: Re: Any reason to keep dvidvi as a separate package outside texlive?

To: Preuße@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>
Cc: lmamane@debian.org, wnpp@debian.org
Subject: Processed: Re: Any reason to keep dvidvi as a separate package outside texlive?
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 22:41:02 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.176454232547822.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] a1999c0c-7424-452f-8654-d215ddc18f2c@web.de>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 1006644 + pending
Bug #1006644 [wnpp] RFA: dvidvi -- Manipulate .dvi files
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 1119401 + pending
Bug #1119401 [src:dvidvi] dvidvi: please build using the default build flags
Added tag(s) pending.
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1006644: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006644
1119401: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1119401
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#1006644: Any reason to keep dvidvi as a separate package outside texlive?
  - From: Preuße, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#1006644: Any reason to keep dvidvi as a separate package outside texlive?
Previous by thread: Bug#1006644: Any reason to keep dvidvi as a separate package outside texlive?
Next by thread: Bug#1121671: ITP: xapp-symbolic-icons -- Set of symbolic icons for GTK applications
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread