Bug#1118667: ITP: bingo -- Like `go get` but for Go tools

[Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org>]

Hi Simon,

On 2025-11-26 11:06, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi.  Do you think there is still any point to avoid using 'bingo' here?
> There is no naming clash.  While we could rename this source and/or
> binary package, the Go team naming policy is to use the upstream name,
> which is 'bingo', and I can't see that there will ever be any conflict
> with your 'libbingo*' namespace here.
>
> https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html#_naming_conventions
>
> So my preference is to go with the Go naming guideline here.  Let me
> know if you still think it would be useful to avoid 'bingo' here.  I
> plan to upload to NEW shortly.

I did not have time to look into src:indigo. Thus feel free to upload 
src:bingo if it does not interfere with bin:libbingo*. It is unlikely 
src:indigo will interfere with the namespace you are intending to take. 
Per [1], bingo is described as "Chemistry search engine for Oracle, 
Microsoft SQL Server and PostgreSQL databases", thus it is unlikely 
there will ever be a need for /usr/bin/bingo.

Best,
Andrius

[1] https://github.com/epam/Indigo