[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1114463: ITP: bazaar -- New FlatPak App Store for GNOME



On Wednesday, November 5, 2025 2:43:48 PM Mountain Standard Time Seyed Mohamad 
Amin Modaresi wrote:
> >  Is it expected that bazaar should build
> > 
> > for i386?
> 
> No, Debian doesn't support i386 after Bookworms.

Debian doesn’t support installing i386 as a hardware distribution, but they 
still support i386 packages, which can be used in chroots.

https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures

For example, see all of the available architectures for the most recent 
courier package:

https://packages.debian.org/sid/courier-authdaemon

This is why the test still exists.  However, because it is not a release 
architecture, if a package does not build for i386 it isn’t a problem for the 
package (a RC bug will not be filed against it, nobody will complain, etc.).

In general, if upstream supports i386, then we want to support it in Debian.  
But, if upstream doesn’t support i386 and it doesn’t build easily, we just 
exclude it from the Salsa CI test.  Hence, the original question of if Bazaar 
is expected to build for i386.

This isn’t something that needs to be sorted out before the initial upload of 
Bazaar, but it would be nice to either get it to build on i386 or exclude the 
Salsa CI test.

> >One other think I noticed after sending the email.  In debian/>copyright,
> >there
> >
> >is a typo.
> 
> ok, I fixed it.
> 
> 
> I uploaded a new package. (the 15th upload in the mentors)

By the way, when I sponsor packages, I always build directly from Salsa.  I 
don’t tend to use the Mentors interface or any of the binaries you upload 
there.  I do this partially because building from Salsa exposes a lot of 
problems with repositories that people can miss when they use Mentors.  But, 
more importantly, building from Salsa better represents the workflow that 
contributors will use when they become DMs or DDs, especially when 
collaborating on packages, so it seems like a good idea to use it from the 
beginning.

Mentors is a good place to find a sponsor if you do not already have a 
relationship with a DD, and it provides valuable feedback for a person’s first 
upload.  So, I am not discouraging you from using it if you find it valuable, 
and particularly when searching for a sponsor.  But for anything I am 
sponsoring, you don’t need to feel obligated to use Mentors.  Just having it 
correct in Salsa and sending me an email is sufficient.  I clone it from Salsa 
using `gbp clone` (which grabs all three branches if they exist) and build it 
with `gbp buildpackage` (which works if the pristine-tar branch exists, 
otherwise I have to use `uscan --download-current-version` and `sbuild`).


I think the package is ready, so I have uploaded it to NEW.  You should 
receive a confirmation email shortly.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: