[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#781993: marked as done (RFP: raet -- secure reliable scalable asynchronous message/event transport written in Python)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:39:02 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <25580e-4c91-f82d-ef84-48e2eb8a928@alteholz.de>
and subject line software abandoned upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #781993,
regarding RFP: raet -- secure reliable scalable asynchronous message/event transport written in Python
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
781993: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Douard <david.douard@logilab.fr>

* Package name    : raet
  Version         : 0.6.3
  Upstream Author : SaltStack Team <thatch@saltstack.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/saltstack/raet
* License         : Apache 2.0
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : RAET is a secure reliable scalable asynchronous message/event transport writen in Python

RAET is designed to provide secure reliable scalable asynchronous 
message/event transport over the internet in a micro-threaded 
multi-process application framework that uses UDP for interhost 
communication and LibSodium for authentication, encryption and the CurveCP 
handshake for secure bootstrap. 

It's one of the 3 transport layers supported by salt.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The software has been abandoned upstream and the repository has been archived. So I am closing this RFP. 

  Thorsten

--- End Message ---
Reply to: