Bug#924659: ITP: fossology -- FOSSology is an open source license compliance software system and toolkit.

Hi,

I'm working on packaging the PHP dependencies for FOSSology and would like to provide an update on the progress.

**Dependency Packages Progress:**

1. **php-firebase-php-jwt** (ITP: #1109343)
- Status: Package created and ready for review
- Version: 6.4.0
- Notes: PHP library for JSON Web Token (JWT) authentication

2. **php-container-interop** (ITP: #1109356)
- Status: Package created and ready for review
- Version: 1.2.0
- Notes: Basic PHP container interface package

3. **php-slim-symfony-di-container** (ITP: #1109357)
- Status: Package created and ready for review
- Version: 1.0.3
- Notes: Symfony DI container adapter for Slim framework

4. **phpoffice-common** (ITP: #1109359)
- Status: Package created and ready for review
- Version: 1.0.5
- Notes: Common library for PHPOffice projects

5. **phpoffice-phpword** (ITP: #1109360)
- Status: Package created and ready for review
- Version: 1.1.0
- Notes: PHP library for reading and writing Word documents

**Current Status:**
- All dependency packages have been created with proper Debian packaging files
- Packages are ready for RFS (Request For Sponsorship)
- Working within the main FOSSology repository structure

**Next Steps:**
- Prepare RFS (Request For Sponsorship) for each dependency package
- Begin work on the main FOSSology package once dependencies are in Debian

**Questions:**
- Should I proceed with RFS for these dependency packages?
- Are there any specific concerns about the packaging approach?
- Should I create separate repositories for each dependency package, or is working within the main FOSSology repository acceptable?

Thanks,
Ahmed