Bug#1002056: ITP: zlib-ng -- optimized zlib compression library
- To: 1002056@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1002056: ITP: zlib-ng -- optimized zlib compression library
- From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:10:22 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 7859dc06-1dec-4327-bcad-e52b2066888b@ixit.cz>
- Reply-to: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>, 1002056@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20231106204405.vlW03XhH@breakpoint.cc>
- References: <YcFN0RTk3yI16p7V@thunder.hadrons.org> <CAARFvTU=RcH7oNxBtXSv62y=eMfxiCFxfGcEHqunZiDGwH2hmQ@mail.gmail.com> <YcFN0RTk3yI16p7V@thunder.hadrons.org> <ZTmF0pn5XQEJbrXj@thunder.hadrons.org> <20231106204405.vlW03XhH@breakpoint.cc> <20231106204405.vlW03XhH@breakpoint.cc> <YcFN0RTk3yI16p7V@thunder.hadrons.org>
Hello,
I think it already makes sense to push zlib-ng and let it co-exist with
zlib since you can port your software directly to the zlib-ng, which I'm
currently doing for Mesa3D.
I dropped the zlib-ng sources into https://salsa.debian.org/dh/zlib-ng
feel free to force push there any Debian relevant changes.
After introducing the zlib-ng, we could continue to the second phase
migrating software still relying on zlib to zlib-ng compat layer.
What do you think?
David
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 21:44:05 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<sebastian@breakpoint.cc> wrote:
> On 2023-10-25 23:17:06 [+0200], Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Hi!
> Hi,
>
> > Ah, thanks! I had in my mind getting back to this ITP, given that the
> > zlib-ng project has continued to gain traction and seems to have
> > consolidated most of the other forks around it.
> >
> > So I'll draft another mail to Mark and probably to debian-devel to
> > discuss this.
>
> Do you want me to join your efforts? This looks interrestig. I may have
> time ;)
>
> > Thanks,
> > Guillem
>
> Sebastian
>
>
--
David Heidelberg
Reply to: