On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 18:38:46 +0100, Thomas Uhle wrote: > sorry for still having another question. I just wanted to try the > "official" binary build, but these just happen to exist for the x86/x86_64 > architectures at this moment (next to unofficial builds). Especially the > builds for the ARM architectures are missing. Do you know why? Do I just > have to wait for them a little longer and be patient? Hm, interesting … Let's have a look: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libdevice-i2c-perl Indeed we only have amd64, arm64, and i386 so far. But the other architectures are in "Needs-Build" state (and not in any state showing a build failure or some other issue), so yes, I think we have to be patient. (I don't know why this takes so long this time … Maybe the buildds are too busy with the ongoing python 3.11 transition but that's just a wild guess.) > So I have downloaded the sources from Debian today and have built > libdevice-i2c-perl locally on my Odroid SBC which is working. I guess this > binary package would be equal to an "official" build. Should be. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature