[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021582: marked as done (ITP: python3-pytest-aiohttp -- Pytest plugin for aiohttp support)

Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:10:43 +0100
with message-id <20230221181043.olpvxedhavvdrwuq@sar0.p1otr.com>
and subject line fixed in 1.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021582,
regarding ITP: python3-pytest-aiohttp -- Pytest plugin for aiohttp support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1021582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name    : python3-pytest-aiohttp
  Version         : 1.0.4
  Upstream Author : aiohttp team <team@aiohttp.org>
* URL             : https://github.com/aio-libs/pytest-aiohttp
* License         : Apache-v2
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Pytest plugin for aiohttp support

pytest plugin for aiohttp support

The library provides useful fixtures for creation test aiohttp server
and client.

Add asyncio_mode = auto line to pytest configuration (see pytest-
asyncio modes for details).  The plugin works with strict mode also.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: pytest-aiohttp
Source-Version: 1.0.4-1

ups, looks like I hijacked your ITP. Sorry.
If you want to comaintain or take over this package, just update it in
DPT repo.

I needed this package as a build dependency for another package and
apparently didn't check WNPP close enough

--- End Message ---
Reply to: