Bug#859739: RFP: pm-graph -- performance analysis of boot, suspend, and resume
On 2017-04-07 11:42:54, Todd Brandt wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:20:04 +0000 Bart Martens
> <bartm@quantz.debian.org> wrote:
>> noowner 859739
>> stop
>>
>> A wnpp bug of type RFP should not have an owner.
>
> I understand. I originally tagged it as ITP because I wanted to own it
> but require a sponsor. If you require a sponsor is ITP even allowed?
yes, I would think so. you can create a Debian package even if you're
not part of Debian per se, and then the sponsor is the person who
actually reviews the work and uploads it in Debian.
So in that sense, yes, it makes sense for an ITP to require a sponsor.
This looks like a really interesting tool, are you still planning on
packaging it?
A.
--
Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given
free access to the sum of all human knowledge.
- Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia
Reply to: