[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#628643: marked as done (RFP: libapache2-mod-spdy -- Apache module for the SPDY)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2022 21:07:03 -0700
with message-id <Yy0w5/i98T9lA2FC@akranes.dyn.fmarier.org>
and subject line No longer relevant
has caused the Debian Bug report #628643,
regarding RFP: libapache2-mod-spdy -- Apache module for the SPDY
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
628643: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libapache2-mod-spdy
  Upstream Author : A few Google people
* URL             : http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy
* License         : Apache License version 2
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : Apache module for the SPDY (HTTPS-like) protocol implemented in chromium

mod_spdy is an Apache 2.x filter module that provides SPDY support in the Apache HTTPD web
server. Because mod_spdy is an Apache module, it can be loaded into currently deployed
Apache HTTPD 2.x web servers using mod_so.

mod_spdy provides two Apache filters: a connection-level filter on the input side, and a
transcode-level filter on the output side. The input filter receives SPDY frames and emits
HTTP requests, while the output filter receives HTTP responses and emits SPDY frames.
Additional details about the input and output filters are provided in the Details section.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
SPDY has been replaced by H2.

This is no longer relevant.

Francois

--- End Message ---
Reply to: