Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2022 01:19:55 +0200 with message-id <7e225a3b-ffdd-3995-614c-665ada979a51@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#995189: RFH: isc-dhcp has caused the Debian Bug report #995189, regarding RFH: isc-dhcp -- popular DHCP client and server by ISC to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 995189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995189 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RFH: isc-dhcp
- From: Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.racine@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 20:25:14 +0300
- Message-id: <163276351465.39253.1530514931961922363.reportbug@voima.lan>
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:isc-dhcp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The ISC DHCP suite has a lenghty list of bug reports that have been left unattended. Some bugs date back to DHCP 3 or even earlier. Additionally, recent upstream releases are still unpackaged. One release came out well ahead of the Bullseye freeze, a bug report requesting its packaging was filed, but it remains unanswered. Leaving a package with a priority Important in such utter state of neglect is unacceptable. At this point, it has become clear that, at the very least, its maintainers need help, hence why I filed this WNPP bug. - -- Martin-Éric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyJACx3qL7GpObXOQrh+Cd8S017YFAmFR/noACgkQrh+Cd8S0 17apRA/9EnsfZnMsWBz07360Z8fqdoZWteKo3Weqfa7lhfVXqHaaWKR1k83uY3gO DEP+NGdDqMs5LVhQ4eDvEeMze2utCx52C2GFHebksI1QyaGruj9PSEu0j5CIBlKu v/fXdk9BXk3oQ4bJoKM8HBifNVx/ICb1X/4wdr78dy4ZYQLB+XLkbQ5DGn/UJ4mr VQctq/uxjFFY1zD+C5Mu7jG/X8eEbSXcshtMkxcoO3GW0c/Bmmy7Rm2exs1zHOkX fAiULeThKPJkpYgbiw6+iPZiJqWeeoDtXo8gInuw8riP3sua9PxhEwKnZBEcACJ3 BAT5ethXxAhC5Ecd+pzuqzlTrP9FYDqPyie3If0A9XK1sDPsnnn5yERWeuAn8L2E 7tZ5BAuBCEskQ+Z9Q1MqgK8/yeabzZRzmd2VCy+FXMfENjhDeGm1YefPSD80mebG UGVbN1MC9274pv6oomPkM6fQidIcbUIZDlBj2qJOxFWgXuv3jcnzWs4+XV9VssiD s/B5+YC9XvItCpZKjAUBaXDUX/hzPqFoseRygRPChxgrzyvP7ChWSz1JY9G73EYg ITe7KHQ9wqAMPJYmUp0ZmcACn9tCWH/xSt99KLrnYURPxNHcYpG8+Pwr5r9swJ50 fjkEyEZWCNUu6u8uUvSx5sPrc29aIpuk+QXeBJIsAB24roy8ONo= =5hUD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 995189-done@bugs.debian.org, martin-eric.racine@iki.fi
- Subject: Re: Bug#995189: RFH: isc-dhcp
- From: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 01:19:55 +0200
- Message-id: <7e225a3b-ffdd-3995-614c-665ada979a51@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <CAPZXPQcUAtbzPS=z10__tjATjGZnGhzd_RF+Kmy67Rv17JY_zg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <YVIQ/YjQykFebPhw@bartik> <CAPZXPQdNRbkn3T3NVkVu-U+0ZWWeLkaxjgzCDecV75n9qXU4=w@mail.gmail.com> <YZ5KMXMBVPT4dw3l@bartik> <CAPZXPQfhTQ0ruhFeNZK1Rh_W4i8otK7b5GQ9czVreZiVcrdoog@mail.gmail.com> <889ECA69-C28D-45BD-83E6-5CB2F741C9B1@riseup.net> <CAPZXPQcAqY=KdNApiT_=cO_KoTBe=V8H8nDwn4MeooJe4f2EdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPZXPQeUqgGMG=2d9FV0Kpq0eeK1UZXD8MYJ+hHR8xQkBSJbVQ@mail.gmail.com> <YhQHvWTQ6korRsWv@bartik> <CAPZXPQdJh0SRCWhtUuNJa8PjUp0cBox=-s-DPM=93jDo_nDDTg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPZXPQftnyVu0_kLZhemHG0nhCGqnjKRicWKiNqa3mKE0g9T8A@mail.gmail.com> <YhSlu57hadowbmSP@bartik> <CAPZXPQcUAtbzPS=z10__tjATjGZnGhzd_RF+Kmy67Rv17JY_zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPZXPQcUAtbzPS=z10__tjATjGZnGhzd_RF+Kmy67Rv17JY_zg@mail.gmail.com>
Santiago has fulfilled this RFH with several uploads. One important thing to solve for a default dhcp client replacement is the isc-dhcp-client-udeb. Ask the release and installer teams about suggestions.
--- End Message ---