Bug#964752: Packaging gosop

To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Cc: 964752@bugs.debian.org, anibal@debian.org
Subject: Bug#964752: Packaging gosop
From: Martin Dosch <martin@mdosch.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:54:00 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20220720175400.odzd3l5ykx23wodn@mdosch.de>
Reply-to: Martin Dosch <martin@mdosch.de>, 964752@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87h73cskeu.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <[🔎] 20220714181123.rkcwnf7m7agg34xa@mdosch.de> <[🔎] 87h73cskeu.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87mu48merd.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>

On 19.07.2022 20:22, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:

I think it would be great if you could push what you've got to salsa!
Aníbal, please speak up if you have a different preference here.  Martin
already did a bunch of the baseline work for this by packaging gopenpgp
earlier, so i think it would be great to have this next piece in debian!

Ok, I just pushed my current progress to salsa:https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/gosop


Best regards,
Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#964752: Packaging gosop
  - From: Martin Dosch <martin@mdosch.de>
- Bug#964752: Packaging gosop
  - From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>

Prev by Date: Bug#1015761: ITP: geogram -- A programming library with geometric algorithms
Next by Date: Bug#1013945: marked as done (ITP: flake8-black -- flake8 plugin to call black as a code style validator)
Previous by thread: Bug#964752: Packaging gosop
Next by thread: Bug#964752: Packaging gosop
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread