[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#989529: marked as done (ITP: neochat -- Client for Matrix chat)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2022 13:47:46 +0900
with message-id <YhB2co7SgBzx02Uw@bulldog>
and subject line Re: Bug#989529: ITP: neochat -- Client for Matrix chat
has caused the Debian Bug report #989529,
regarding ITP: neochat -- Client for Matrix chat
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
989529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org

* Package name    : neochat
  Version         : 1.2.0
  Upstream Author : 2020 Carl Schwan <carl@carlschwan.de>
                    2020 Noah Davis <noahadvs@gmail.com>
                    2020 Tobias Fella <fella@posteo.de>
                    2021 Srevin Saju <srevinsaju@sugarlabs.org>
		    (and others)
* URL             : https://invent.kde.org/network/neochat
* License         : GPL-2+ etc
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : Client for Matrix chat

A client for matrix, the decentralized communication protocol.

This package will be maintained in the Qt/KDE group.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Andres,

thanks for your message, but I have no interested in it anymore, due to
political decisions by the ruling class in Debian.

I am closing this bug, maybe someone else wants to take it.

Best

On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On 11/7/21 02:03, Norbert Preining wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andres,
> > 
> > > Norbert, I'd planned to remove Spectral from sid once you uploaded Neochat.
> > > Do you have a timeline for when you plan to do that? Since Spectral was
> > Hmm, the current released version is - well - not sure how useful. I
> > tried it without too much success, though.
> > 
> > I was waiting for a new release, but somehow it isn't coming.
> 
> 
> It looks like there's been a few releases since then, with v22.02 a week
> ago.
> 
> 
> > 
> > > released with bullseye, we should probably provide a transitional package
> > > that pulls in Neochat for bookworm. Once you upload Neochat I can do that as
> > > part of the Spectral source package, or I can remove the Spectral source
> > > package in advance of your upload and have you provide the spectral
> > > transitional package as part of Neochat. Which would you prefer?
> > Hmm, I guess it is better to have a spectral trans package built from
> > neochat than from the spectral sources.
> > 
> > Could you send a MR that adds the transitional package to
> > 	salsa.debian.org:qt-kde-team/extras/neochat.git
> > ? That would be very helpful.
> 
> 
> I submitted a merge request, but it's untested due to the lack of
> kquickimageeditor package. I see you're planning to ITP it (#989528), so
> once that's done and you're preparing to upload neochat, I can give it a
> test. Thanks!
> 

--
PREINING Norbert                              https://www.preining.info
Fujitsu Research     +    IFMGA Guide     +    TU Wien    +    TeX Live
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

--- End Message ---
Reply to: