[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#995189: RFH: isc-dhcp



El 07/11/21 a las 13:54, Martin-Éric Racine escribió:
> Howdy!

Hi!

> 
> ma 27. syysk. 2021 klo 21.44 Santiago Ruano Rincón
> (santiagorr@riseup.net) kirjoitti:
> > El 27/09/21 a las 20:25, Martin-Éric Racine escribió:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: normal
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 src:isc-dhcp
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > > The ISC DHCP suite has a lenghty list of bug reports that have been left unattended. Some bugs date back to DHCP 3 or even earlier.
> > >
> > > Additionally, recent upstream releases are still unpackaged. One release came out well ahead of the Bullseye freeze, a bug report requesting its packaging was filed, but it remains unanswered.
> > >
> > > Leaving a package with a priority Important in such utter state of neglect is unacceptable.
> > >
> > > At this point, it has become clear that, at the very least, its maintainers need help, hence why I filed this WNPP bug.
> >
> > Indeed. I am willing to spend some cycles to help maintaining it. I
> > requested access to the ISC DHCP packaging team in salsa ~a couple of
> > weeks ago, but I hasn't been answered yet (mgilbert is its only member).
> > It was on my ToDo list to ping the maintainers (in CC).
> 
> Has any progress taken place on this?
> 
> Martin-Éric

I've started doing some work at https://salsa.debian.org/santiago/isc-dhcp/

I still didn't get any answer from current maintainers (keeping them in
CC), so I plan to retitle this bug as an ITS bug soon. Hopefully no
later than next Friday.

Cheers,

 -- Santiago

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: