[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#994967: r-cran-googlesheets4_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi Andreas,


On 19.10.21 19:46, Andreas Tille wrote:
do you have an idea which package contains roxygen2, which is used to create googlesheets4-package.Rd?
The term "package" in CRAN terminology is usually what we have as a r-cran-CRANPACKAGE so this
is r-cran-roxygen2.

aaah, ok , I did find this.


Anyway, upstream has different ideas about the copyright holder in googlesheets4-package.Rd and LICENSE.
There seems to be room for improvement.
On what string is your statement based?  The copyright holder of the
automatically generated file should be the same as the source, shouldn't
it.

Yes, it is not the copyright of that file but its contents.

 googlesheets4-package.Rd  says: "\item RStudio [copyright holder, funder]"
 LICENSE says:  COPYRIGHT HOLDER: Jennifer Bryan and RStudio

So I would say that Jennifer Bryan is paid by RStudio for the work on r-cran-googlesheets4, but RStudio is the only copyright holder.

For the moment I've added a separate

    Files: man/googlesheets4-package.Rd

paragraph even if I do not see any actual reason for it.

Neither do I, sorry.

   Thorsten


Reply to: