[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#964324: marked as done (RFA: gnunet-fuse -- secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (fuse filesystem client))



Your message dated Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:48:28 +0000
with message-id <E1lFvH2-0006lx-V3@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#964324: fixed in gnunet-fuse 0.13.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #964324,
regarding RFA: gnunet-fuse -- secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (fuse filesystem client)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
964324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the gnunet-fuse package.

The package description is:
 GNUnet is a peer-to-peer framework which focuses on providing security. All
 link-to-link messages in the network are confidential and authenticated. The
 framework provides a transport abstraction layer and can currently encapsulate
 the peer-to-peer traffic in UDP, TCP, or SMTP messages.
 .
 This package contains the fuse filesystem client. In order use GNUnet, you also
 need gnunet-server either on your server or on your local machine.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnunet-fuse
Source-Version: 0.13.0-2
Done: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnunet-fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 964324@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> (supplier of updated gnunet-fuse package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:28:28 +0100
Source: gnunet-fuse
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13.0-2
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Closes: 964324
Changes:
 gnunet-fuse (0.13.0-2) sid; urgency=medium
 .
   * Uploading to sid.
   * New maintainer, thank you Marc for all your work (Closes: #964324).
   * Updating vcs fields.
Checksums-Sha1:
 71110038fab04c8d4679d347627e5067c779b529 1986 gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2.dsc
 1796e8196a19b1db505a4267892ff41e2420596c 13124 gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 8bc6364919dfa9ca4bb40a1834955cbf8221b413 9157 gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 e17a9811d1460ca143b1a49eb2a3db302e6da1a40f46c377a979946e89ff5848 1986 gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2.dsc
 48fdefbed7a692bc6b3b2b0dcab9581c4b8fb45211a024062fcfae6a824aed5f 13124 gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 18e476140491f35eccc3250bdc2b021eac1c5e2b03e88520cd5a9edf5b9ff6a0 9157 gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 02f2400b99b9e33621a14712aecb19eb 1986 net optional gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2.dsc
 bb0c5c708d3da0409e9ee4c3198f290f 13124 net optional gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 125c65e02321f9a70f8c622a343e82e8 9157 net optional gnunet-fuse_0.13.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2H4N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: