[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#981297: marked as done (ITP: smbus2 -- another pure Python implementation of the python-smbus package)



Your message dated Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:49:45 +0100
with message-id <CALF6qJmv--hja_CpXfXbvQ2iFNynuvyv+urt8pzsXtg-M8FS6A@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #981297,
regarding ITP: smbus2 -- another pure Python implementation of the python-smbus package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
981297: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981297
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name    : smbus2
  Version         : 0.4.1
  Upstream Author : Karl-Petter Lindegaard
* URL             : https://github.com/kplindegaard/smbus2
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : another pure Python implementation of the python-smbus package

another pure Python implementation of the python-smbus package
Currently supported features are:
     Get i2c capabilities (I2C_FUNCS)
     SMBus Packet Error Checking (PEC) support
     read_byte
     write_byte
     read_byte_data
     write_byte_data
     read_word_data
     write_word_data
     read_i2c_block_data
     write_i2c_block_data
     write_quick
     process_call
     read_block_data
     write_block_data
     block_process_call
     i2c_rdwr - combined write/read transactions with repeated start

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---


Anton

--- End Message ---

Reply to: