[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#968921: ITP: dotnet-core-3.1 -- Microsoft .NET Core SDK 3.0.100



On Sun, 2020-08-23 at 18:06 -0500, Alistair Young wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alistair Young <avatar@arkane-systems.net>
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, avatar@arkane-systems.net
> 
> * Package name    : dotnet-core-3.1
>   Version         : 3.0.100
>   Upstream Author : Microsoft <dotnetcore@microsoft.com>
> * URL             : https://dotnet.microsoft.com/
> * License         : MIT
>   Programming Lang: C++, C#, F#
>   Description     : Microsoft .NET Core SDK 3.0.100
> 
> .NET Core is a development platform that you can use to build
> command-line applications, microservices and modern websites. It
> is open source, cross-platform and is supported by Microsoft.
> 
> Relevant information:
> 
> This package is built from the Microsoft-provided source-build
> repository, which provides a source tarball for .NET Core
> specifically intended to meet "common Linux distribution guidelines".
> 
> As Microsoft themselves point out, packaging this for main is
> useful because it lowers the barrier to use of .NET Core to one
> equivalent to other in-distro languages without requiring the
> use of third-party repositories, especially when the runtime is
> needed as a dependency of another package. (This latter is
> among my personal motivations for doing this, insofar as another
> package I have in process, systemd-genie, requires this.)
> 
> I anticipate maintaining this package myself; this should be
> quite simple given the dotnet/source-build repository which
> provides all necessary components to be packaged in the proper
> form, and will become even simpler once bootstrapping is
> no longer necessary.
> 
> I will, however, need a sponsor.

Hi,

I'd be happy to sponsor uploads for this, let me know once the work is
done and I'll review.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: