Bug#962239: RFP: jc -- converts command output to JSON
Hi Sudip,
We have updated jc to version 1.12.0 which now has a lower version requirement for pygments.
Jc now only requires pygments version 2.3.0 and above, so it should package with the existing pygments version now.
Thanks,
Kelly
> On Jun 8, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Kelly Brazil <kellyjonbrazil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ah yes, the minimum pygments version should probably be v2.4.2.
>
>> On Jun 8, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:03:35PM -0700, Kelly Brazil wrote:
>>> Package: wnpp
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>>
>>> I am the developer of jc, which is now packaged on OpenSUSE, NixOS, macOS (Homebrew), and FreeBSD (ports). jc is currently in process for packaging on Fedora.
>>>
>>> jc is licensed under the MIT license.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc
>>> https://pypi.org/project/jc/
>>>
>>> JSON CLI output utility
>>
>> I do not use this personally, but I think this might be a good package
>> to be in Debian. I made an initial packaging, but getting error while
>> trying to use that.
>>
>> $ ls -l /usr/bin | jc --ls
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/bin/jc", line 11, in <module>
>> load_entry_point('jc==1.11.2', 'console_scripts', 'jc')()
>> File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jc/cli.py", line 401, in main
>> json_out(result, pretty=pretty, mono=mono, piped_out=piped_output())
>> File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jc/cli.py", line 249, in json_out
>> class JcStyle(Style):
>> File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pygments/style.py", line 101, in __new__
>> ndef[0] = colorformat(styledef)
>> File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pygments/style.py", line 58, in colorformat
>> assert False, "wrong color format %r" % text
>> AssertionError: wrong color format 'ansiblue'
>>
>> I have also tried with ls -l /usr/bin | jc --ls -m
>>
>> Note: This works fine when I install Pygments from pip3 (v2.6.1) rather
>> than using the Debian version which is v2.3.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Sudip
>
Reply to: