[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging



Hi

Thanks for the update. I had problems sending the email.

El 7/5/20 a las 12:55 PM, Geert Stappers escribió:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the Language Server Protocol
> Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com>
> Control: subscribe -1
>
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió:
>>>> Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too!
>>> [.....]
>>>> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the
>>>> owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP".
>>> Yes, I committed to packaging
>>>> If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for
>>>> #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for
>>>> python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks
>>>> relationship between the two bugs.
>>> You mean
>>>
>>> Control: block 946035 by -1
>>> Control: block #[newcode] by -1
>>>
>>> Something like this?
>>>
>> yes go ahead.
>>
>> I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help?
>>
> I felt the need to show how to do it.
>
>
>
>>>> Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and
>>>> "reportbug" for filing the ITP.  IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail
>>>> transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most
>>>> people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with
>>>> Postfix, Exim, etc.
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to do it manually for now, see:
>>>>   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
>>> Ok
>>>
>>> Thanks for all
>>>
>>> P.
>>>
> @Pablo 
>
> My intension is to help.
> I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did.
>
> Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605
> can be easily updated again.
>
>
> Regards
> Geert Stappers


Reply to: