[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete



Thanks a lot!

> Uploaded.  Unfortunately I realised to late that the python3-*
> dependencies are not resolved automatically.  I've added these manually
> in Git and will upload with the source-only upload that is needed after
> the package is accepted.

To run the unittest we need some more dependencies like `scipy`, `qt`
but they are optional for the runtime of `ete3`.
That is, users can still use some API of `ete3` without `qt`, `skbio `.

On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:31 PM Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:49:41PM +0800, zhao feng wrote:
> > I have enabled the pipeline in one fork
> > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/python-ete3/-/pipelines/153000
> > and I think the build error does not exist any more.
>
> Yes, I've uploaded now.
>
> > > Finally I'm wondering whether the binary package should be rather
> > > Architecture: all .
> > Done
>
> Uploaded.  Unfortunately I realised to late that the python3-*
> dependencies are not resolved automatically.  I've added these manually
> in Git and will upload with the source-only upload that is needed after
> the package is accepted.
>
> Thanks for your work on this
>
>      Andreas.
>
> PS: Future discussion is better on debian-med@lists.debian.org.
>     In case you might have other packages that are interesting for
>     bioinformatics please also do this in Debian Med team.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: