Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2020 14:36:29 -0500 with message-id <c4c6f41c61f5b47a73b9ee89f56ef32ec3293125.camel@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFH: mawk has caused the Debian Bug report #949781, regarding RFH: mawk -- a pattern scanning and text processing language to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 949781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFH: mawk
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:13:42 -0500
- Message-id: <dd1886675f2f830c0da1b293c5fdc69bbc8561df.camel@debian.org>
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Hi all, TL;DR: I'm looking for people to help with packaging the new upstream release of mawk into Debian. Co-maintainers are also welcome. Mawk is an important implementation of AWK and is of Priority: required. However, Debian's mawk hasn't been updated even if there's a new upstream since 2009. You can find some of the new upstream's comments over this issue at https://invisible-island.net/mawk/ . Currently as the new package maintainer, I believe it's necessary to find more co-maintainers and uploaders who are more familiar with AWK than me. Tasks include packaging new upstream releases, testing possible regressions and going through everything currently lying in the Bug Tracking System. The previous work can be found on Salsa packaging repo. I'm open to direct git commits on Salsa and NMUs as long as they do not introduce obvious regression (and break all reverse build-dependencies, a.k.a. almost everything in the archive :-). -- Thanks, Boyuan YangAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 949781-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFH: mawk
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 14:36:29 -0500
- Message-id: <c4c6f41c61f5b47a73b9ee89f56ef32ec3293125.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <dd1886675f2f830c0da1b293c5fdc69bbc8561df.camel@debian.org>
- References: <dd1886675f2f830c0da1b293c5fdc69bbc8561df.camel@debian.org>
Hi, On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:13:42 -0500 Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > > Hi all, > > TL;DR: I'm looking for people to help with packaging the new upstream release > of mawk into Debian. Co-maintainers are also welcome. > > Mawk is an important implementation of AWK and is of Priority: required. > However, Debian's mawk hasn't been updated even if there's a new upstream > since 2009. You can find some of the new upstream's comments over this issue > at https://invisible-island.net/mawk/ . > > Currently as the new package maintainer, I believe it's necessary to find more > co-maintainers and uploaders who are more familiar with AWK than me. Tasks > include packaging new upstream releases, testing possible regressions and > going through everything currently lying in the Bug Tracking System. The > previous work can be found on Salsa packaging repo. I'm open to direct git > commits on Salsa and NMUs as long as they do not introduce obvious regression > (and break all reverse build-dependencies, a.k.a. almost everything in the > archive :-). Since the new version has already settled in the Debian archive, I'm closing the RFH bug. Please note that I am still looking for co-maintainers for package mawk. If you are interested, please let me know. -- Thanks, Boyuan YangAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---