Bug#636016: marked as done (ITP: goodbye -- next part after 'hello', and a packaging example)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:13:36 +0100
with message-id <20201122181336.GA32236@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: goodbye_0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
has caused the Debian Bug report #636016,
regarding ITP: goodbye -- next part after 'hello', and a packaging example
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
636016: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ITP: goodbye -- next part after 'hello', and a packaging example
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:17:49 +0200
- Message-id: <20110730101749.5824.12147.reportbug@orthanc.angband.pl>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
* Package name : goodbye
Upstream Author : myself
Git : git://gitorious.org/pkg-goodbye/goodbye.git
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : next part after 'hello', and a packaging example
Using slow, bloated tools like debhelper and dpkg-dev will cost you precious
SECONDS when building your package. Multiplied by tens of thousands of
packages Debian has, this can be a burden on archive rebuilds. Thus, this
is a proposal and example how to get rid of that inefficiency.
Written in a Real Man(tm)'s scripting language with a JIT compiler, it's
over two orders of magnitude faster than mainstream packaging techniques.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 636016-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: goodbye_0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:13:36 +0100
- Message-id: <20201122181336.GA32236@angband.pl>
- In-reply-to: <E1kYtIX-0007Wz-0H@fasolo.debian.org>
- References: <E1kYtIX-0007Wz-0H@fasolo.debian.org>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 04:00:09PM +0000, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> sorry, I am going to reject this package. None of us in the ftpteam
> can see why this should go into the archive.
So it looks like troll packages are discriminated against!
Finally closing, the joke has been done. The educational aspect is mostly
irrelevant now that dh is near-mandatory.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: