On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 17:55 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote: > Hello Ben, > > I asked about possibility of changing name and the final reply is [1]. > > Quoting dreamer: > Right now, we are fighting to convince users (and developers) to move > on from using a myriad of tiny DOSBox forks (link - very incomplete, > there are ~50 other dead forks I know of) or maintain their own > patchsets based on 10-year old 0.74. We have already certain (hard > thought for) recognition and community formed up - changing name at > this point will only cause confusion and hurt the project's prospects > for future. Oh well, thanks for asking anyway. I suggest you make the long description clearly state that this is independent of the original DOSBox project. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings To err is human; to really foul things up requires a computer.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part