Bug#962417: pll-modules_0.0+git20170809.d6cc565-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Thorsten,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:00:09PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> I wonder whether you are really the copyright holder of debian/missing-sources/*
IMHO scientific data are not really copyrightable. Thus consequently
there should be a paragraph
Files: debian/missing-sources/testdata
Copyright: none
and the source (download location, scientific paper, etc.) should
be mentioned. I'm also not sure how to specify the mandatory License
field.
I have a general question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to keep the WNPP
bug in CC in case of rejects? I'm doing this hereby manually since I
frequently was wondering why some package is WNPPed for some time but
not uploaded. Seeking for rejects becomes more and more hard since I
have the feeling search engines stopped indexing Debian lists - at least
its not reliable to find something. If the WNPP bug would be in CC
this would be very convenient.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: