[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#946945: Maybe ruby-unidecode is not necessary at all



Am Freitag, den 27.12.2019, 16:42 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta:
> On 27/12/19 7:19 am, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > after I've read Matijs' comment I checked if we can use some more recent
> > (and
> > maybe already packaged) unidecoder gem. It seems to me that jekyll-import
> > (again) does not use the gem at all. I cannot find any reference to
> > decode() or
> > the Unidecoder module.
> > 
> > Maybe we don't need it at all?
> 
> Could you maybe confirm and send a patch upstream to ensure the same?

It is used in a few cases, but its usage seems replaceable:
https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-import/issues/424#issuecomment-569177796

Regards, Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: