Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?

To: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Cc: 919190@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?
From: Bruno Kleinert <fuddl@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:23:08 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 995ee4ce186edf0166fa2c6d0383b8d8962a7461.camel@debian.org>
Reply-to: Bruno Kleinert <fuddl@debian.org>, 919190@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20191114110321.GA17716@thunder.hadrons.org>
References: <631dc5defbeeff34d9669ac4f4e9d38ffceea05a.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 20191114110321.GA17716@thunder.hadrons.org> <631dc5defbeeff34d9669ac4f4e9d38ffceea05a.camel@debian.org>

Am Donnerstag, den 14.11.2019, 12:03 +0100 schrieb Guillem Jover:

Hi!

I noticed that the keepassxc-browser packages that were sitting in NEW

(<

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

>), disappeared from there and

are not in the archive either. Does this mean they got REJECTED?

Thanks,

Guillem

Hi Guillem,

yes it got rejected. I discussed the reason for rejection with upstream and a resolution is in the works. I will re-upload to NEW as soon as the solution is released.

Cheers - Bruno

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?
Next by Date: Bug#852167: marked as done (O: pm-utils -- utilities and scripts for power management)
Previous by thread: Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?
Next by thread: Bug#919190: keepassxc-browser status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread