[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#753565: marked as done (O: ajaxterm -- Web based terminal written in Python.)



Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:35:53 +0000
with message-id <E1hrRXt-0007qE-N9@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#932325: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753565,
regarding O: ajaxterm -- Web based terminal written in Python.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
753565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to orphan the ajaxterm package.

The package description is:
 Ajaxterm is a web based terminal written in Python and some AJAX
 javascript for client side. It can use almost any web browser
 and even works through firewalls.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.10-13+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ajaxterm has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/932325

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: