On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:46:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2019-02-18 17:39:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:This is an incredibly generic package name. Please pick something more descriptive.This was already reported by Paride Legovini, an hour ago. Please follow the conversation there. I would welcome help convincing upstream to rename the package, for example.
Paride was talking about the *binary name*, Scott is talking about the *package name*. (Consequently he has probably been following the conversation just fine). Quite aside from the binary name clash problems, "dt" is a very short package name, and a more descriptive package name would serve as a form of self-documentation. "dnstool" would seem perfectly consistent with the way upstream refer to the project (GitHub title: DNS tool - display information about your domain) -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀