[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#875667: fixed in tclxml 1:3.2.5-1



On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 07:04:41 +0000 Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:38:52 +0200
> Source: tclxml
> Binary: tclxml tclxml-dev
> Architecture: source
> Version: 1:3.2.5-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Tcl/Tk Debian Packagers <pkg-tcltk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> Changed-By: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>
> Description:
>  tclxml     - Tcl library for XML parsing
>  tclxml-dev - Tcl library for XML parsing - development files
> Closes: 875667
> Changes:
>  tclxml (1:3.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * New Maintainer; Tcl/Tk Debian Packagers team maintenance (Closes: #875667)
>    * Convert repository to git and git-buildpackage
>    * Reformat d/copyright for DEP5
>    * Switch upstream to github/wjoye. Adjust packaging to new upstream.
>    * New upstream version 3.2.5. Increase epoch to drop 3.3~ prereleases
>    * Revert to old pkgIndex.tcl
>    * Push Standards-Version to 4.1.4. No changes needed.
>    * Push compat to 11
>    * Update VCS fields to use salsa.d.o

This doesn’t seem a wise move to me, since this is a significantly older
version of the code which is missing some features, bug fixes and tests,
and doesn’t bring a lot of fixes. I’m not sure what value this switch
had, to be honest.

> Checksums-Sha1:
>  a4704f893513a677e4aaa276663ea3cdc1ff35c0 2004 tclxml_3.2.5-1.dsc
>  45d143963c12e8ba1bf2837940bf4e425bd212d9 349691 tclxml_3.2.5.orig.tar.gz
>  a6ea8c15a82d96b98daf91d9cd389bac9037e6cc 5236 tclxml_3.2.5-1.debian.tar.xz
> Checksums-Sha256:
>  1b51ff7b3609b2d484a9b2d97651b76e7c65f711b412673b23a30140f172cad5 2004 tclxml_3.2.5-1.dsc
>  bb607a850efdf7823865f854e008ebdc684571842371f234a24284b09c5670ac 349691 tclxml_3.2.5.orig.tar.gz
>  f5dc5b9bdf50fa88f231a12836be522932c978950a4c2993a94343c0fb7c617f 5236 tclxml_3.2.5-1.debian.tar.xz
> Files:

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew


Reply to: