[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#892904: marked as done (ITP: django-ranged-fileresponse -- include Content-Range headers in file response)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2018 09:06:21 -0400
with message-id <52448d33-7f2d-bd26-8a4b-31befeb01052@mailbox.org>
and subject line Closing this ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #892904,
regarding ITP: django-ranged-fileresponse -- include Content-Range headers in file response
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892904: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Valleroy <jvalleroy@mailbox.org>

* Package name    : django-ranged-fileresponse
  Version         : 0.1.2
  Upstream Author : Spindle <hello@wearespindle.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/wearespindle/django-ranged-fileresponse
* License         : Expat
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : include Content-Range headers in file response

This is a modified FileResponse that returns `Content-Range` headers
with the HTTP response, so browsers (read Safari 9+) that request the
file, can stream the response properly.

This is a dependency for the new version of django-captcha, which adds
support for Django 2.0. I plan to maintain it within the Debian Python
Modules Team.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Actually django-ranged-response (#892909) is needed instead of
django-ranged-fileresponse. Closing this ITP.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: