[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#830812: marked as done (O: referencer -- GNOME Document Organiser)



Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2018 10:05:45 +0000
with message-id <E1es42z-000CGf-Tw@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#891699: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #830812,
regarding O: referencer -- GNOME Document Organiser
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
830812: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intent to orphan referencer as I stopped using this software for a
couple of years now and am not able to maintain it in Debian anymore.
Upstream does not look very active either (no release for two years) so
I'm not sure it's really maintained after all.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.2-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package referencer has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/891699

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: