[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#913157: marked as done (ITP: node-jest-worker -- Module for executing heavy tasks under forked processes in parallel)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Nov 2018 15:51:16 -0500
with message-id <70755d0fe8687ee716fdcdee5edfd016@babelouest.org>
and subject line Close bug report #913157: ITP: node-jest-worker -- Module for executing heavy tasks under forked processes in parallel
has caused the Debian Bug report #913157,
regarding ITP: node-jest-worker -- Module for executing heavy tasks under forked processes in parallel
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
913157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913157
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
package: node-jest-worker
Severity: whishlist
Owner: 'Nicolas Mora' <nicolas@babelouest.org>

*Package Name : node-jest-worker
 Version : 23.2.0
 Upstream Author : Facebook Inc.
*URL : https://github.com/facebook/jest/tree/master/packages/jest-worker 
*License : Expat
*Description : Module for executing heavy tasks under forked processes in parallel, by providing a Promise based interface, minimum overhead, and bound workers. The module works by providing an absolute path of the module to be loaded in all forked processes. Files relative to a node module are also accepted. All methods are exposed on the parent process as promises, so they can be await'ed. Child (worker) methods can either be synchronous or asynchronous.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
duplicate of #890253 since node-jest-worker is a subset of node-jest

--- End Message ---
Reply to: