[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#911235: marked as done (ITP: multiblend -- multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images)



Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:20:11 +0000
with message-id <E1gCoYN-00065x-S4@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing ITP: multiblend -- multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images
has caused the Debian Bug report #911235,
regarding ITP: multiblend -- multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
911235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

--- Please fill out the fields below. ---

Package name: multiblend
Version: 0.6.2

Upstream Author: David Horman <david@horman.net>

URL: http://horman.net/multiblend/

License: GPL-2+
Description:

*multiblend* is a multi-level image blender for the
seamless blending of panoramic images, such as those created with
PTAssembler <http://www.tawbaware.com/ptasmblr.htm> (my personal favourite), Hugin <http://hugin.sourceforge.net/>, or PTGui <http://www.ptgui.com/>. It is a significantly faster drop-in alternative to /Enblend/ <http://enblend.sourceforge.net/>, although it lacks /Enblend's/ advanced features.

I'm working on build this package https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multiblend


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Please retitle bug 911206 from RFP to ITP and set yourself as the owner.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: