[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#881414: marked as done (ITP: prochunter -- find hidden processes on Linux)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:59:42 -0300
with message-id <CABwkT9rqYk+ZsRL3=QLJ+VA_7v2B-J+WuGJg78ekbSH-ofbDNg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #881414,
regarding ITP: prochunter -- find hidden processes on Linux
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
881414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Samuel Henrique" <samueloph@gmail.com>
Severity: wishlist

​* Package name    : prochunter
  Upstream Author : nowayout <spartak@autistici.org>
* URL             : https://gitlab.com/nowayout/prochunter
* License         : GPLv2
  Programming Lang: Python, C
  Description     : Find hidden process with all userspace and most of the kernelspace rootkits

​Prochunter aims to find hidden process with all userspace and most of the kernelspace rootkits.
This tool is composed of a kernel module that prints out all running processes walking the task_struct list and creates /sys/kernel/proc_hunter/set entry. A python script that
invokes
the kernel function and diffs the module output with processes list collected from userspace (/proc walking).​

​I intend to maintain this package under the pkg-security team.​


--
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I no longer intend to package prochunter given i won't have the time right now.

-- 
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>

--- End Message ---
Reply to: