[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#660701: marked as done (RFP: wymeditor -- web-based WYSIWYM XHTML editor)



Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:20:32 +0000
with message-id <E1fcvNQ-0000YR-C9@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: wymeditor -- web-based WYSIWYM XHTML editor
has caused the Debian Bug report #660701,
regarding RFP: wymeditor -- web-based WYSIWYM XHTML editor
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660701: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý" <ondrej@debian.org>

* Package name    : wymeditor
  Version         : 0.5~rc2
  Upstream Author : Jonatan Lundin
* URL             : http://www.wymeditor.org/
* License         : GPL+MIT
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description     : web-based WYSIWYM XHTML editor

WYMeditor is a web-based WYSIWYM (What You See Is What You Mean) XHTML
editor (not WYSIWYG).

WYMeditor's main concept is to leave details of the document's visual
layout, and to concentrate on its structure and meaning, while trying
to give the user as much comfort as possible (at least as WYSIWYG
editors).

WYMeditor has been created to generate perfectly structured XHTML
strict code, to conform to the W3C XHTML specifications and to
facilitate further processing by modern applications.

[pulled as django-cms dependency, well in fact it embeds this code]



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
RFP 660701 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: