[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697415: marked as done (RFP: hdhomerun-config-gui -- GUI Configuration utility for Silicon Dust HD HomeRun)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2018 04:20:10 +0000
with message-id <E1enGSQ-0005Hn-D1@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: hdhomerun-config-gui -- GUI Configuration utility for Silicon Dust HD HomeRun
has caused the Debian Bug report #697415,
regarding RFP: hdhomerun-config-gui -- GUI Configuration utility for Silicon Dust HD HomeRun
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
697415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : hdhomerun-config-gui
  Version         : 20120405
  Upstream Author : Sillicon Dust
* URL             : http://www.silicondust.com/support/hdhomerun/downloads/linux/
* License         : GPLv3
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : GUI Configuration utility for Silicon Dust HD HomeRun

GUI Configuration utility for Silicon Dust HD HomeRun
 This package supports the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun.
 The HDHomeRun is a networked, two tuner digital TV tuner
 compatible with MythTV, SageTV, and VLC.

(Description from Ubuntu)

Since this package is already packaged for (Myth)Ubuntu, it should be fairly
straight forward to pull into Debian.  The command line companion to this
(libhdhomerun, hdhomerun-config) is already packaged in Debian.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 697415 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: