> If you've already looked at find-file-in-project, would you please > add > a "Reviewed by" to #873105? I suspect that might speed things along. I added a reviewed by to the bug. It looked like more of the tests ran with the new upstream release 5.4.1 than with 5.4.0 with emacs25. (from a fresh download from upstream) > > If there's no rush I'd like to continue to work on solving the > remaining issues with the packaging. My hypotheses on why the tests > are 100% failing are 1) that the tests need to be patched to > correctly > set the working directory 2) an error somewhere in generating a > dh_python binary package and a dh_elpa binary package from the same > src:package. 3) failure to account for a hypothetical autotest- > helper > framework that upstream uses. My plan for 1 is to write a maintainer > script to automate this work on a patch-branch, and/or to submit the > patch-set upstream. For 2: find the error and fix it. 3 requires > study. I plan to test these hypotheses in descending order. Seems reasonable, good luck. I might be able to help with python issues. Diane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part