On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 02:31:48PM +0200, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote: > On 02.09.2015 11:23, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-edu-pkg-team@lists.alioth.debian.org, 1o5g4r8o@gmail.com > > > > What about packaging just kiwix-serve? > > It shouldn't depend on xulrunner, and adding it back into debian would > > mean that there would be at least one reader for ZIM files, which is > > currently lacking. > > > > .. _kiwix-serve: http://www.kiwix.org/wiki/Kiwix-serve > > > > Definitely a good idea! I support it to 100%. I'm ready to answer to > questions and help any volunteer maintainer wanting to work on this. This > should not be too complicated and the impact would be huge. For what it's worth, seperate RFP bug reports were filed for kiwix-serve (kiwix-serve, actually) and kiwix-lib: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856595 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856552 So some future for Kiwix in Debian may exist after all. :) Once those are done, maybe someone could start looking at the XUL extension again? Or should we just give up on that? A.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature