[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#664554: marked as done (RFP: libtaocrypt -- portable, fast, cryptographic library)



Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2017 04:20:07 +0000
with message-id <E1d7wd5-000502-QS@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: libtaocrypt -- portable, fast, cryptographic library
has caused the Debian Bug report #664554,
regarding RFP: libtaocrypt -- portable, fast, cryptographic library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
664554: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mysql-5.1
Version: 5.1.57-1
Severity: wishlist

While debugging the FTBFS on i386 I have found two embedded libraries
included in MySQL source code: yassl (extra/yassl) and taocrypt
(extra/yassl/taocrypt), both available from www.yassl.com as separate
libraries.

Since it is against the policy (although only 'should') and it's a
hell from security POV[1], it would be much better to package those two
libraries separately and link MySQL against separate packages if
possible (there could be some MySQL source changes which would
disallow to do so).

Other thing which hit me is that MySQL AB blatantly relicenced the
source code of both libraries, which might be violation of GPL.  Or
there is some background agreement between the MySQL AB/Oracle and
Sawtooth Consulting Ltd. which is not visible from the source code.
Please note that this relicensing might raise the severity to RC, but
since the www.yassl.com lists the MySQL as a user of their libraries,
I guess they are ok with it.


1. Are you able to tell if any of those security advisories listed 
   here: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6145/ apply to MySQL?
   I am not even able to tell which version of yaSSL is bundled
   with MySQL.  It seems to me that it's 1.6.0 and it is vulnerable
   to: http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/yasslick-adv.txt

O.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers natty-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'natty-updates'), (500, 'natty-security'), (500, 'natty'), (100, 'natty-backports')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
RFP 664554 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: