[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#585902: marked as done (RFP: libhighscale-java -- high performance java collection alternatives)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:19:59 +0000
with message-id <E1cxFZH-0006pQ-HP@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: libhighscale-java -- high performance java collection alternatives
has caused the Debian Bug report #585902,
regarding RFP: libhighscale-java -- high performance java collection alternatives
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
585902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585902
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Evans <eevans@debian.org>

* Package name    : libhighscale-java
  Version         : 1.1.2
  Upstream Author : Cliff Click
* URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-scale-lib
* License         : Public Domain 
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description     : high performance java collection alternatives

A collection of concurrent and highly scalable utilities. These are
intended as direct replacements for the java.util.* or
java.util.concurrent.* collections but with better performance when many
CPUs are using the collection concurrently. Single-threaded performance
may be slightly lower.

The above long description is copypasta from upstream will need some work
prior to upload. Suggestions welcome.

-- 
Eric Evans
eevans@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 585902 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: