On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > There was a previous ITP[0] for fpm and there were several concerns > regarding the fact that they are (were?) not using dpkg to build the > packages. > > Do you know if has been resolved? I didn't know previous ITP #688896 before, let me check it first. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature