On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> There was a previous ITP[0] for fpm and there were several concerns
> regarding the fact that they are (were?) not using dpkg to build the
> packages.
>
> Do you know if has been resolved?
I didn't know previous ITP #688896 before, let me check it first.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature